Case: Robbery (Knife) – s. 344(1)(b) CC Suspect: Brandon Scott (19) Interviewer: Cst. K. Malcolm (Primary) Strategy: "Addiction-Driven Desperation" (Normalization) + "Minimization of Violence" (Intent)
iNTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT
START TIME: 23:15 hrs LOCATION: District 3 – Interview Room 1 PRESENT: Cst. Malcolm, Cst. Yee (Monitoring/Silent), Suspect (Brandon Scott)
(SCENE SETTING: The room is set up for a "vulnerable suspect." The table is clear. Cst. Malcolm sits at a 45-degree angle, removing the physical barrier. Brandon is slumped in the chair, wearing a grey prisoner jumpsuit (clothes seized). He looks pale, sweaty, and his pupils are pinpoint—signs of opioid use/early withdrawal. He is shivering slightly.)
CST. MALCOLM: Hey Brandon. I appreciate you sitting down with me. I know it’s late and I know you’re probably not feeling 100% right now.
SCOTT: (Mumbles, looking at floor) I’m freezing.
CST. MALCOLM: Yeah, I can see you shivering. The holding cells are always cold. Let me grab the thermostat here and bump it up a bit. (Adjusts wall thermostat). I’ll get you a blanket in a minute if you need one. Can I get you a water or a juice box?
SCOTT: Water.
CST. MALCOLM: Cst. Yee, can you grab a water? Thanks. (Cst. Yee leaves and returns with water. Brandon drinks it quickly.)
CST. MALCOLM: Brandon, before we get into anything, we need to handle the legal stuff. I know the arresting officer read you your rights, and I know you spoke to Legal Aid duty counsel at 23:02 hours. Is that correct?
SCOTT: Yeah.
CST. MALCOLM: Okay. I need to make sure we are on the same page. You understand that you do not have to say anything to me? You have the right to remain silent.
SCOTT: Yeah, the lawyer said that.
CST. MALCOLM: Good lawyer. You also have the right to speak to a lawyer again if you feel you need to during this conversation. Do you understand that?
SCOTT: Yeah.
CST. MALCOLM: (Operating Mind Assessment - Critical for Intoxication) Brandon, I want to be straight with you. I know you use fentanyl. I can see you’re a bit pinned right now, maybe starting to feel sick?
SCOTT: I’m coming down. It sucks.
CST. MALCOLM: I know it does. But I need to make sure your brain is working right now. Can you tell me where we are?
SCOTT: Police station. District 3.
CST. MALCOLM: And why are you here?
SCOTT: Robbery. The store.
CST. MALCOLM: Okay. So you know what’s going on. Are you feeling clear-headed enough to decide if you want to talk to me?
SCOTT: I’m awake. I’m fine.
CST. MALCOLM: Okay. Are you talking to me voluntarily right now?
SCOTT: I guess so.
PHASE 1: RAPPORT & BASELINE (THE "HUMAN" APPROACH)
CST. MALCOLM: Look, Brandon, I’m not here to yell at you. I look at your file, and I see a 19-year-old kid. You shouldn’t be in a grey suit in a police station. You should be playing video games or working a job or hanging out with friends. How long have you been dealing with the fentanyl?
SCOTT: Since I was like 17.
CST. MALCOLM: That’s young, man. That’s a heavy weight to carry. Is it a daily thing now?
SCOTT: Pretty much. If I don’t use, I get sick. Like, bones hurting sick.
CST. MALCOLM: I hear that. It stops being about getting high and starts being about just feeling normal, right? Just trying to stop the pain.
SCOTT: Exactly. People don’t get that. They think I want to be like this.
CST. MALCOLM: I get it. I see it every day on the street. Good people who get hooked on something that takes over their brain. You staying anywhere right now? Or couch surfing?
SCOTT: Couch surfing. Sometimes at my buddy’s in Bowness. Sometimes... wherever.
CST. MALCOLM: That’s exhausting. Never knowing where you’re sleeping, waking up sick, having to hustle just to feel okay. That puts a lot of pressure on a person. It puts you in a survival mode, doesn’t it?
SCOTT: Yeah. It’s hell.
(ANNOTATION: Rapport is established. Malcolm has validated Scott's struggle without judging the drug use. He has framed Scott as a "victim of addiction" rather than a criminal. This establishes the primary theme: Desperation, not Malice.)
PHASE 2: THEME INTRODUCTION (DESPERATION & IMPULSE)
CST. MALCOLM: Brandon, I want to talk about tonight. But before we do, I want you to know how I see this. There are guys who rob places because they are greedy. They want the rush. They want to hurt people. They are predators. And then there are guys who are sick. Guys who wake up, realize they have no money, feel the sickness coming on, and panic. They make a split-second decision because their body is screaming at them. You don’t strike me as a predator, Brandon. You strike me as a guy who was desperate to stop the pain.
SCOTT: I’m not a predator. I don’t hurt people.
CST. MALCOLM: I believe that. I really do. But right now, on paper, this looks bad. It says "Robbery with a Weapon." That sounds violent. That sounds like a guy who went in there to terrorize a clerk. My job right now is to find out if you’re a dangerous criminal, or if you’re a 19-year-old kid who made a desperate mistake because of the drugs. Which one is it?
SCOTT: It was a mistake. But I didn’t rob him.
(ANNOTATION: The First Denial. Scott accepts the "Mistake" label but denies the legal charge. This is expected. Malcolm does not argue facts yet.)
PHASE 3: SOFT CONFRONTATION & EVIDENCE GRADIENT
CST. MALCOLM: Okay. You didn’t rob him. Here is what I have to work with, Brandon. We have a clerk who is terrified. We have video of a guy in a black hoodie, white shoes, slim build—looks exactly like you. And when Cst. Yee stopped you three blocks away, you ran. Why did you run if you didn’t do anything?
SCOTT: I ran because I have a warrant. I’m on probation. I panicked.
CST. MALCOLM: Fair enough. Panic makes people run. I’ll give you that. But here is the problem. When we searched you, you had $340 in loose bills in your pocket. And two packs of DuMaurier Reds. That is the exact amount taken from the till. Those are the exact cigarettes the clerk handed over. Now, you can tell me you "found" them. But finding $340 cash and cigarettes lying on the sidewalk at 10:30 at night? Brandon, I respect you too much to believe that. And if you tell a judge that, they are going to think you are treating them like an idiot. You’re not a liar. You’re just in a bad spot. Did you find that money, or did you go into that store because you needed it to score?
SCOTT: I... I found it near the dumpster.
CST. MALCOLM: (Pauses. Looks disappointed, not angry.) Near the dumpster? Where you were hiding? Brandon, look at me. The video shows the guy putting the cash in his left pocket. That’s where we found it on you. The video shows the guy grabbing the smokes with his right hand. I’m not asking if you were there. I know you were there. The cameras know you were there. I’m asking why. Was it the sickness? Were you hurting?
SCOTT: (Head drops, voice quiet) I haven’t used since this morning. I felt like my skin was burning.
(ANNOTATION: The Pivot. Scott has abandoned the "I found it" lie and pivoted to his internal state. This is an admission of motive.)
PHASE 4: THEME DEVELOPMENT (MINIMIZATION OF INTENT)
CST. MALCOLM: There it is. That’s the truth. You were hurting. When you’re feeling like that, your brain turns off the logic. All you can think about is "I need to fix this." So you saw the store. It was quiet?
SCOTT: Yeah. No cars.
CST. MALCOLM: So you didn’t want a confrontation. You waited until it was empty because you didn’t want to deal with people. You just wanted the cash and to get out.
SCOTT: Yeah. Just quick.
CST. MALCOLM: (Actus Reus Confirmation) So you went inside. You went to the counter. What did you say to him?
SCOTT: I told him to give me the money.
CST. MALCOLM: Did you yell? Or were you just firm?
SCOTT: I wasn’t yelling. I just said, "Give me the cash, don't be stupid."
CST. MALCOLM: Okay. See? A violent guy screams. A violent guy jumps the counter. You stayed on your side. You just wanted the transaction to be over. But Brandon, we have to talk about the knife.
SCOTT: (Tenses up) I didn't use a knife.
CST. MALCOLM: (Soft Confrontation) Brandon. The camera is really high def. It shows a black folding knife in your right hand. And we found a black folding knife five meters from where Cst. Yee caught you. I’m not saying you stabbed anyone. I’m not saying you tried to cut him. I think you brought it because you’re a small guy, and you were worried he might try to be a hero. You pulled it out just to say "I'm serious," right? Not to hurt him?
SCOTT: I wasn't gonna stab him! I swear.
CST. MALCOLM: I believe you. If you wanted to stab him, you would have. You didn’t. You stood back. So the knife was just a... a prop? Just to make him move faster?
SCOTT: Yeah. Just to scare him. Make him open the drawer.
CST. MALCOLM: (Mens Rea Confirmation) Okay. So you showed him the knife so he would give you the money, because you needed it for drugs.
SCOTT: Yeah.
CST. MALCOLM: And as soon as he gave it to you, you left?
SCOTT: Yeah. I grabbed the smokes and ran.
CST. MALCOLM: You didn’t hit him? Didn’t push him?
SCOTT: No! I never touched him.
CST. MALCOLM: That’s huge, Brandon. That is the difference between a robbery and an assault. You kept your hands to yourself. That shows me you still have a line you won’t cross.
(ANNOTATION: Full admission obtained. Malcolm has guided Scott to admit to the weapon by framing it as a "tool for speed" rather than a "weapon for violence." This secures the Robbery charge while allowing Scott to save face.)
PHASE 5: NARRATIVE & SEQUENCE
CST. MALCOLM: Okay, let’s go back for a second just so I have the sequence right for my notes. I want to make sure I’m telling your story accurately. You’re walking down 14th Street. You’re feeling sick. You see the Quick Mart. Walk me through it step-by-step.
SCOTT: I saw the store. I checked for people. Put my mask up. Hood up. I walked in. The guy was behind the counter. I pulled the knife out of my pocket. Opened it. I walked up and said "Give me the cash." He looked scared. He opened the till. He put the money on the counter. I took it. I saw the cigarettes and grabbed those too. Then I ran out.
CST. MALCOLM: Where did you go when you ran out?
SCOTT: Up the alley. North.
CST. MALCOLM: And then you saw the police car?
SCOTT: Yeah. I saw the lights. I freaked out. I threw the knife.
CST. MALCOLM: Why did you throw it?
SCOTT: Because I didn’t want to have it on me. I knew it was bad.
CST. MALCOLM: That shows you knew it was wrong, Brandon. That guilt kicked in right away.
PHASE 6: FUTURE CONSEQUENCE & IDENTITY
CST. MALCOLM: Brandon, you’re 19. You have your whole life ahead of you. This addiction is driving the bus right now, but it doesn’t have to be the end of the story. By telling the truth tonight, you’re taking the first step to taking the wheel back. You admitted you were wrong. You admitted you were desperate. You admitted you didn’t want to hurt anyone. That matters.
SCOTT: Am I going to jail?
CST. MALCOLM: (Oickle Firewall) I’m going to be honest with you. Robbery is a serious charge. You are on probation. You are likely going to be held for a bail hearing tonight. I cannot promise you what the judge will do. I cannot promise you bail or a specific sentence. I have no control over that. But what I can promise is that I will write in my report that you were cooperative, that you were respectful, and that you were honest about your motivation. I will make sure the court knows this was driven by addiction, not by a desire to be violent. Do you understand that distinction?
SCOTT: Yeah.
CST. MALCOLM: Do you have any questions for me?
SCOTT: No. I just... I want to see a doctor. I feel really sick.
CST. MALCOLM: I will make sure the cells sergeant knows you need to see the medic immediately. We’ll get you looked after. I’m going to type up a quick statement based on what we said. We’ll get it signed, and then we’ll get you some medical attention.
END TIME: 23:45 hrs
POST-INTERVIEW ANALYSIS
1. Vulnerability Management: The suspect was withdrawing from fentanyl. The officer performed a robust Operating Mind check at the start and monitored his physical state (shivering, sweating). The officer provided care (water, heat) before asking for a confession, ensuring the statement wasn't induced by a promise of relief.
2. Theme Efficacy: The "Addiction as the Villain" theme worked perfectly. It allowed Brandon to externalize the blame ("the drug made me do it") while accepting legal responsibility for the act. This bypassed his shame about being a "criminal."
3. Denial Pivoting: When Brandon tried the "I found it" lie, the officer used Evidence Gradient. He didn't show the CCTV immediately. He used the cash/cigarettes first. When that wasn't enough, he used the CCTV to close the door on the lie, but did so gently ("I respect you too much to believe that").
4. Weapon Admission: Getting a suspect to admit to a knife is difficult. The officer used the Minimization technique—suggesting the knife was for fear/compliance rather than injury. This made it psychologically safe for Brandon to admit to possession.
5. Legal Safety: The officer explicitly used the Oickle Firewall at the end. When asked "Am I going to jail?", he refused to lie or offer false hope, which protects the statement from being thrown out as an inducement. The officer also prioritized medical care at the end, showing duty of care.
Strategic Pivot: While the previous script used an Emotional/Supportive approach ("You are a victim of addiction"), this interview uses a Rational/Pragmatic approach. The investigator treats Brandon as a young adult capable of making logic-based decisions. The strategy focuses on the "Evidence Trap" and "Damage Control."
Case: Robbery (Knife) – s. 344(1)(b) CC Suspect: Brandon Scott (19) – Probationer, Fentanyl user. Interviewer: Det. B. Yee (Primary) Tone: Professional, direct, logical, "The Closer."
INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT
START TIME: 00:10 hrs (Post-processing/CCTV Review) LOCATION: District 3 – Interview Room 2 PRESENT: Det. B. Yee, Suspect (Brandon Scott)
(SCENE SETTING: Det. Yee enters the room carrying a laptop and a single evidence bag containing the seized cash. He places the laptop closed on the table. He sits down, opens his notebook, and looks at Brandon silently for a moment. This is a non-verbal tactic to establish control and gravity.)
DET. YEE: Alright, Brandon. It’s past midnight. I know you’re tired. I know you’re starting to feel the withdrawal kicking in. I’ve seen the shakes starting. We’re going to get through this, but we need to do it right. First, legal housekeeping. The arresting officer read you your Charter rights. You spoke to Legal Aid duty counsel at 23:02 hours. Is that correct?
SCOTT: (Arms crossed, shivering slightly) Yeah.
DET. YEE: Okay. I need to be 100% sure you understand what that means. You do not have to say a word to me. You have the right to silence. You have the right to call a lawyer again if you need to. Do you understand those rights?
SCOTT: I talked to the guy. He said don’t say anything.
DET. YEE: And that is good advice. It’s your right to follow it. However, I’m here to lay out the reality of the situation so you know exactly what is happening to you tomorrow morning. If you choose to talk to me voluntarily, that’s your decision. Are you willing to listen and talk with me right now?
SCOTT: I’ll listen.
DET. YEE: (Operating Mind Protocol ) Brandon, look at me. I know you use fentanyl. I know you’re coming down. I need to know that you are here, in this room, mentally. Tell me what you are charged with.
SCOTT: Robbery.
DET. YEE: And what does "Robbery" mean to you?
SCOTT: Stealing stuff.
DET. YEE: Stealing stuff using violence or threats. It’s different than theft. You understand that distinction?
SCOTT: Yeah.
DET. YEE: Okay. You seem oriented. If at any point you feel too sick to understand me, you tell me and we stop. Deal?
SCOTT: Deal.
PHASE 1: RAPPORT & BASELINE (THE "ADULT" APPROACH)
DET. YEE: Brandon, I’ve been looking at your history. You’re 19. You’ve got a youth record. You’ve got some adult theft convictions. You’re on probation right now. To me, looking at this paper, I see a guy who is slowly sliding down a funnel. It starts with shoplifting, moves to breaches, and now we are sitting here talking about an armed robbery. That is a steep slide. You strike me as a guy who is street smart enough to know how the system works. You know that being on probation and catching a new charge means you’re likely not going home tonight.
SCOTT: I figured.
DET. YEE: Right. So the question isn’t "Are you going home?" The question is "How long are you going away for?" I treat people like adults in this room. I don’t baby them. I want to talk about your day. Not the robbery yet. Just the day. What were you doing before 10:00 PM?
SCOTT: Just hanging out. Walking around.
DET. YEE: Walking around where?
SCOTT: Hillhurst. Bowness. Just around.
DET. YEE: It’s cold out there. You doing okay for money? Food?
SCOTT: Not really. I’m broke.
DET. YEE: (Baseline established) Being broke is a dangerous place to be when you have a habit. I know you use. I’m not judging it, it’s a medical fact. When you’re broke and sick, the brain turns off the "consequences" switch and turns on the "survival" switch. Is that fair to say?
SCOTT: Yeah. It sucks.
DET. YEE: I know it does. And that survival mode is usually what brings people into this room.
PHASE 2: THEME INTRODUCTION (RATIONAL CHOICE & DAMAGE CONTROL)
DET. YEE: Here is the situation, Brandon. The Crown Prosecutor is going to look at this file tomorrow. They have two ways to look at it. Option A: Brandon Scott is a dangerous, violent offender who targets lone clerks at night, threatens them with knives, and terrorizes the community. That guy needs federal prison time. 4 or 5 years. Option B: Brandon Scott is a 19-year-old addict who was dope-sick, made a desperate, impulsive decision to get cash, never hurt anyone, and regrets it. That guy needs help and a sentence that reflects a mistake, not a career choice. Right now, the evidence points to Option A. My job is to find out if Option B is actually the truth. But I can’t do that if you sit there and tell me the sky is green.
SCOTT: I’m not dangerous. I didn’t hurt anyone.
DET. YEE: (Soft admission of presence) You didn’t hurt anyone? That’s good. That’s the most important thing. But to prove you aren't dangerous, we have to deal with the facts. The clerk says a knife was used. A knife changes everything. If you tell me "I wasn't there," I can't help you with the knife question. If you tell me "I was there, but I didn't mean to hurt him," then we have a conversation.
PHASE 3: THE DENIAL & LOGIC TRAP
SCOTT: I wasn’t there. You got the wrong guy.
(ANNOTATION: The expected denial. Det. Yee does not get angry. He uses the "Evidence Gradient" to dismantle the lie systematically.)
DET. YEE: (Leans forward, opens the evidence bag slightly) Brandon, stop. I respect you enough not to lie to you. Don't lie to me. Let’s look at the math. Fact 1: The robbery happens at 22:15. Fact 2: The suspect takes exactly $340 from the till. Fact 3: The suspect takes two packs of DuMaurier Reds. Fact 4: Seven minutes later, I stop you three blocks away. And what is in your pocket? $340 cash. And two packs of DuMaurier Reds. What are the odds, Brandon? What are the odds that you found the exact items taken from a robbery, three blocks away, seven minutes later?
SCOTT: I found them! Someone must have ditched them.
DET. YEE: (Soft Confrontation ) Come on. You found $340 lying on the ground? In loose bills? And you just happened to be running when I saw you? If you stick to that story, the judge is going to laugh. And then they are going to throw the book at you because you’re insulting the court’s intelligence. It’s a bad lie, Brandon. It’s a panic lie. You have the money because you took the money. The question isn’t did you take it. The question is why. Was it the sickness?
SCOTT: (Looking trapped, breathing speeds up) I didn't rob him though.
DET. YEE: (The Pivot Point) Okay. You didn't "rob" him. Explain that to me. Because you have the money. How did you get it if you didn't rob him?
SCOTT: I just... I asked him for it.
DET. YEE: You asked him?
SCOTT: Yeah. I just said give me the money. I didn't touch him.
(ANNOTATION: Admission of Presence and Actus Reus (taking). Now the focus shifts to the weapon.)
PHASE 4: THE WEAPON (MINIMIZATION OF INTENT)
DET. YEE: Okay. So you went in. You demanded the money. You got the money. That’s honest. That matches the video. Now we have the hard part. The knife. The clerk says you pulled a knife. The video shows a black folding knife in your hand. And we found a black folding knife right where you stopped running. Brandon, possessing a knife is one thing. Planning to stab someone is another. I need to know: Did you bring that knife to use it? Or did you bring it just to make him listen?
SCOTT: I didn't have a knife.
(ANNOTATION: He is admitting the theft but denying the weapon because he knows "Armed Robbery" is the major charge. This is a "Partial Denial.")
DET. YEE: (Theme: Tool vs. Weapon) Brandon, listen to me. The video is high definition. It’s in 4K. I can see the knife. I can see the blade. If you lie about the knife now, after admitting to the money, you lose all the credit you just gained. I don’t think you went in there to stab sameer. I think you’re a small guy. I think you were worried that the clerk might try to grab you or hit you. I think you pulled the knife for protection, not aggression. You just wanted to scare him so he wouldn’t fight you. Is that what happened?
SCOTT: I wasn't gonna stab him.
DET. YEE: I know. But you had it out, didn't you? Just to show him you were serious?
SCOTT: Yeah. I just showed it to him. I didn't point it at him.
DET. YEE: (Mens Rea Confirmation) You showed it so he would open the till faster?
SCOTT: Yeah. I just wanted to get out of there.
DET. YEE: Okay. That makes sense. It was a tool to get the job done quickly. You weren't hunting him. You were hunting the cash.
SCOTT: Exactly. I just needed the money for pills.
PHASE 5: THE NARRATIVE SEQUENCE (LOCKING THE DETAILS
DET. YEE: Okay, Brandon. You’re doing the right thing here. This puts you in "Option B" — the desperate kid, not the monster. I need you to walk me through it step-by-step so I can write this report accurately. You’re outside. You’re feeling sick. Why that store?
SCOTT: It’s quiet. Usually only one guy working.
DET. YEE: So you scoped it out?
SCOTT: I just looked in the window. Saw he was alone.
DET. YEE: Smart. You didn't want witnesses. You didn't want a crowd. So you go in. Hood up?
SCOTT: Yeah. And my mask.
DET. YEE: You walk to the counter. When do you pull the knife?
SCOTT: Right when I got to the counter. I pulled it out of my pocket and opened it.
DET. YEE: Okay. And what exactly did you say?
SCOTT: I said "Open the register. Give me the cash."
DET. YEE: Did you say "Don't be stupid"?
SCOTT: Maybe. I don't remember exactly. I just wanted him to hurry up.
DET. YEE: And he complied?
SCOTT: Yeah. He put the money on the counter. And I saw the smokes so I grabbed those too.
DET. YEE: Then what?
SCOTT: I ran. I went out the door and up the alley.
DET. YEE: And when you saw me?
SCOTT: I panicked. I knew I had the knife. I threw it.
DET. YEE: Why did you throw it?
SCOTT: Because I didn't want to get caught with it.
DET. YEE: (Guilt Indicator) That tells me you knew it was wrong. You knew it was illegal.
SCOTT: Yeah. Obviously.
PHASE 6: CLOSING & OICKLE FIREWALL
DET. YEE: Okay. We have the whole picture now. You entered the store to get money for drugs. You targeted it because it was quiet. You showed the knife to ensure compliance, but you had no intention of hurting the clerk. You fled, panicked, and were caught. Is that the truth?
SCOTT: Yes.
DET. YEE: Is there anything else you want to tell me about other files? Other break-ins?
SCOTT: No. Just this one. It’s the first time I did a robbery.
DET. YEE: (Important Pattern Note) First time. That’s good to know. It helps the "desperation" story. Now, Brandon, listen carefully. I am going to type this up. I am not the judge. I am not the Crown. I cannot promise you that you will get bail. I cannot promise you a light sentence. Robbery is serious. All I can promise is that I will write down that you were cooperative, that you were honest about the knife, and that you stated clearly you had no intent to injure the clerk. Do you understand that I am not offering you a deal?
SCOTT: Yeah. I get it.
DET. YEE: Do you have any questions for me?
SCOTT: Can I get a blanket? I’m really cold now.
DET. YEE: Yes. Once we sign this, I’ll get you a blanket and see if the medic can check on you for the withdrawal symptoms.
SCOTT: Okay. Thanks.
DET. YEE: Let’s get this done.
END INTERVIEW: 00:35 hrs
CRITICAL ANALYSIS: WHY THIS SCRIPT WORKS
1. The "Adult" Tone (Rapport): Unlike the previous script which "parented" the suspect, Det. Yee treated Brandon like an adult making business decisions. This respects the suspect's autonomy, which often reduces the need for the suspect to "fight back" to assert dominance.
2. The Logic Trap (Denial Handling): When Scott used the "Found It" denial, Yee didn't use empathy. He used Logic. He laid out the statistical impossibility of the claim. This forces the suspect to abandon the lie because maintaining it makes them look foolish, not innocent.
3. Tool vs. Weapon Theme (The Knife): The most dangerous part of this interview legally is the knife admission. Yee successfully used the Minimization of Intent theme. He allowed Scott to admit to the Actus Reus (holding the knife) while softening the Mens Rea (intent to kill/harm) to "intent to scare." This secures the Robbery charge while making the admission psychologically palatable.
4. Operating Mind (Fentanyl Context): Yee conducted a robust check at the start. He acknowledged the withdrawal symptoms but used them to confirm the suspect was uncomfortable but alert. This protects the statement from being thrown out later on the grounds of intoxication.
5. The "Empty Chair" / Option A vs B: Yee presented two narratives: "The Predator" vs. "The Desperate Kid." This is a classic Binary Theme. It forces the suspect to choose the lesser of two evils. To avoid being labeled a predator, Scott had to admit to being the desperate robber.
This script demonstrates high-level Theme-Based Cognitive Interviewing applied to a resistant, street-smart subject.